When I found out we were watching a movie in class I was really excited because I love watching movies and it's probably something I spend a little too much of my time doing. Anyways, the movie that we watched was Adaptation. It's about the screenplay writer Charlie Kaufman making an adaptation of Susan Orlean's book, The Orchid Thief. He struggles with writer's block as he wants to make a true and honest film about orchids instead of a cliché Hollywood movie. I think in the movie, Charlie's twin brother, Donald, is meant to represent that cliché side.
The movie was kind of a satire on the whole conventional Hollywood movie. I think it was pretty clear when everyone thought in their heads "She's going to kill him", then burst out laughing when she actually said it. But it didn't start that way. In the beginning, it was Charlie struggling to be original and make his version of the movie but once he goes to the screenwriting seminar and invites Donald to New York, everything changes. It becomes the cliché movie he was trying to avoid. I'm not exactly sure about what this movie says about writing but I think there will always be a difficult process to it. It always needs inspiration and a storyline. You can't just write a story where "nothing much happens." However, you don't always need the typical, overdone conventions of a Hollywood film. Some of my favourite movies are more independent films where they do struggle, like Charlie mentioned, but they also change and have those epiphany's. It's impossible to write a story about nothing.
Overall, I think I did enjoy this movie. I think if I just watched it as a movie, my first impression would be that I didn't like it but after thinking about it, it does make sense to me. I liked how confusing it was; not so much in the movie itself (and it was confusing at times) but how it was written by Charlie Kaufman about Charlie Kaufman with Donald Kaufman, who doesn't actually exist. I often do like a movie where I like the actors too, ie. Tilda Swinton, Meryl Streep, Maggie Gyllenhaal. I don't exactly know if my interpretation of Adaption. is correct but that's what I got out of it. Charlie tried to make an original adaptation of a book but in the end had to adapt himself to the typical norms of a Hollywood movie.
And Nicolas Cage wasn't bad too, I guess.
The movie was kind of a satire on the whole conventional Hollywood movie. I think it was pretty clear when everyone thought in their heads "She's going to kill him", then burst out laughing when she actually said it. But it didn't start that way. In the beginning, it was Charlie struggling to be original and make his version of the movie but once he goes to the screenwriting seminar and invites Donald to New York, everything changes. It becomes the cliché movie he was trying to avoid. I'm not exactly sure about what this movie says about writing but I think there will always be a difficult process to it. It always needs inspiration and a storyline. You can't just write a story where "nothing much happens." However, you don't always need the typical, overdone conventions of a Hollywood film. Some of my favourite movies are more independent films where they do struggle, like Charlie mentioned, but they also change and have those epiphany's. It's impossible to write a story about nothing.
Overall, I think I did enjoy this movie. I think if I just watched it as a movie, my first impression would be that I didn't like it but after thinking about it, it does make sense to me. I liked how confusing it was; not so much in the movie itself (and it was confusing at times) but how it was written by Charlie Kaufman about Charlie Kaufman with Donald Kaufman, who doesn't actually exist. I often do like a movie where I like the actors too, ie. Tilda Swinton, Meryl Streep, Maggie Gyllenhaal. I don't exactly know if my interpretation of Adaption. is correct but that's what I got out of it. Charlie tried to make an original adaptation of a book but in the end had to adapt himself to the typical norms of a Hollywood movie.
And Nicolas Cage wasn't bad too, I guess.




